To test the hypothesis that irrational relationship beliefs related to perceived parent-adolescent relations and conflict resolution behaviors, Pearson Moment Correlations were calculated. The correlations among scores on the ICDS, CRS, MRS, FRS are presented in Table 1. 06, p>.236) and father-adolescent relations (r = .07, p>.229). 23, p<.001). Result showed that Interpersonal Rejection subscale of ICDS had highest correlation with CRS (r = -.44, p<. 001).
Individuals whose mediocre get fell above the median was indeed branded because higher dysfunctional relationship philosophy classification, and the ones with the typical rating beneath the average had been branded once the low impaired relationship opinions class
In this study, it was expected that individuals with high dysfunctional beliefs would endorse more less conflict resolution behaviors and perceive theft relations with parents bdsm telefoonnummer negatively than those of low dysfunctional beliefs. To test this hypothesis, the high and low irrational group were defined by a median split on the ICDS score (median = ). Multivariate analysis of variances was performed to determine whether individuals having high irrational relationship beliefs vary from those not having irrational relationship beliefs across MRS, FRS and CRS. The result of analyses revealed that contrary to hypothesis, there was no significant group difference on mothers-adolescent relations (Wilks’ Lambda = .971, F =.77, p>.696) and father-adolescent relations (Wilks’ Lambda=.967, F = .88, p>.578). Consistent with the prediction, significant group difference was found on conflict resolution behaviors (Wilks’ Lambda = .896, F = 4.12, p<.001). When compared to individuals with high irrational beliefs about relationships, individuals with low irrational beliefs endorsed significantly more conflict resolution behaviors. Subsequent univariate results indicated that differences between low and high dysfunctional relationship beliefs groups were significant on focing other's needs (F = 9.77, p<.001), social adaptation (F = 9.82, p<.001) and anger management subscales (F = 3.97, p<.020) of CRS (Table 2).
Sure enough, bad and you can reasonable peak contacts ranging from impaired dating opinions and dispute solution behaviors were discover (roentgen = –
Stepwise regression analyses was basically performed to examine activities one to anticipate seen parents-adolesents affairs and argument quality routines just like the founded details. Separate variables that were under study have been sex, many years, sorts of home, parents relationship, academic number of parents, number of sis and sister as well as the order away from beginning, household members build and you will impaired relationship opinions. So you’re able to influence you are able to separate parameters, very first, Beta weights was computed toward test. The greatest contributing separate variables to the established variable variance was in fact integrated studies. Procedure are finished immediately following in addition to every independent variables you to donate to the latest said difference. Due to the fact sex, educational amount of parents and kind away from home had been categorical, these people were included into regression analysis shortly after are dummy coded (0 otherwise step one).
Beta weights showed that beliefs about interpersonal rejection was the most significant predictor for conflict resolution behaviors. Results also showed that gender and the beliefs about interpersonal misperception were predictors of conflict resolution behaviors. Stepwise regression analysis to determine the best model in predicting for conflict resolution behaviors was completed in three stages. The beliefs about interpersonal rejection was entered in Step 1. The contribution of beliefs about interpersonal rejection was statistically significant, accounting for 20 % of the total variances, F = , p< .001. When gender was entered into the equation in Step 2, explained variance of CRS increased to 27 % from 20 %, F = , p< .001. Gender difference was found between men and women on conflict resolution behaviors. Women had significantly higher scores than men in CRS scores (t = 5.05, p<. 001).
In Step 3, the beliefs about interpersonal misperception were included and this variable explained 3 % of the variance, F = , p< .001. The beliefs about interpersonal rejection, interpersonal misperception and gender accounted for 31% of the variance.